ABSTRACT
<p><b>Objective</b>To evaluate the effect and safety of phloroglucinol combined with parecoxib on cystospasm after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We conducted a prospective randomized case-control study on 98 patients treated by TURP. After operation, the patients were randomly assigned to a treatment (n=50) and a control group (n=48), the former treated by intravenous injection of 80 mg phloroglucinol qd plus 40 mg parecoxib bid while the latter given 80 mg phloroglucinol only, both for 3 successive days. Then we recorded the frequency and duration of cystospasm, visual analogue scales (VAS), adverse reactions, post-operative bladder irrigation time, catheter-indwelling time, and hospital stay and compared them between the two groups of patients.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with the controls, the patients in the treatment group showed a significantly lower frequency of cystospasm (［1.95±0.14］ vs ［0.70±0.65］ times, P<0.01), duration of cystospasm (［0.44±0.21］ vs ［0.12±0.14］ min, P<0.01), and VAS score (2.70±1.80 vs 1.90±1.30, P<0.01) at 48－72 hours after TURP, but no statistically significant differences were found between the control and treatment groups in the post-operative bladder irrigation time (［2.75±0.87］ vs ［2.64±0.83］ d, P>0.05), catheter-indwelling time (［3.52±0.32］ vs ［3.44±0.42］ d, P>0.05), and hospital stay (［5.23±0.81］ vs ［5.10±0.73］ d, P>0.05), and no obvious adverse reactions were observed in either of the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Phloroglucinol combined with parecoxib is more effective and safer than phloroglucinol alone in relieving postoperative cystospasm after TURP.</p>
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Case-Control Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Isoxazoles , Therapeutic Uses , Length of Stay , Phloroglucinol , Therapeutic Uses , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Spasm , Drug Therapy , Therapeutic Irrigation , Transurethral Resection of Prostate , Treatment Outcome , Urinary BladderABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GreenLight 120-W laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP for randomized control trials and their references addressing 120-W PVP versus TURP in the treatment of BPH. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently accomplished the screening, quality assessment, and data extraction of the identified studies and performed meta-analyses using RevMan 5.2.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Totally, 6 randomized control trials were included in this analysis, involving 703 cases, 351 treated by PVP and 352 by TURP. Compared with TURP, PVP showed significantly decreased time of catheterization (by 32. 55 hours, 95% CI 15.3 -49.8, P < 0.01), hospital stay (by 1.85 days, 95% CI 1.2-2.5, P < 0.01), and intraoperative blood loss (by 15.6 g/L, 95% CI 10.0-21.2, P < 0.01), but increased time of operation (by 9.37 minutes, 95% CI 5. 1-13.6, P < 0.01). There was also a significant reduction in blood transfusion, TUR syndrome, and capsular perforation in the PVP group. At 12 months after surgery, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the improvement of maximum urinary flow rate, IPSS, postvoid residual, and sexual function.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>GreenLight 120-W laser PVP is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of BPH, with similar effectiveness to TURP but less blood loss, shorter time of catheterization and hospital stay, and lower incidences of blood transfusion, TUR syndrome and capsular perforation.</p>